[citation][nom]jaquith[/nom]Hmm...your 26 posts here vs my 13950 @ TH? I'd ask the same. CPU-z sig's don't help anything and signatures/system specs that are indexed throw-off searching. I don't feel the need to display any of my CPU-z for that reason. It wasn't my point.Have you read any of the latest News and Articles here? Granted some are great. Up to early this year they were perfectly fine, folks got along, they participated, engaged each other, (good stuff), but lately they're (TH) aggravating their user base to the point of you have to ignore a lot of them. The reviews and articles weren't so biased and they jived with other sites findings, but lately ... they don't.So what I'm really trying to do is get the Editors to be Authentic & Non-biased. I've tried 'nice', I've tried 'debate' and nothing's sinking in.[/citation]
You lost me. I just don't see it. Maybe refer to a particular article that really made you hurt. The trinidy benchmarks seemed pretty ok to me. The RoboHornet Pro article was a bit strange, but I tried it myself and I got pretty crazy strange results as well. I read the articles regularly. Nothing extreme, I mean I've seen that some of the writers prefer intel over AMD, at least it feels that way, but it's a subtle feel of tendency. Nothing incredibly bias sorta speak. If you know any one person or group that is not ever ever bias, then you're lying. We're all guilty of it at some degree. I guess what I'm going to assume is, you must be comparing them to someone else. Someone you've set as the God of all test (considering you would have to say that you have access to all the hardware they have access to, to claim you did all the tests yourself). And if you do have other sources, I dare you to say that any computer hardware result is 100% accurate every time. Because to that I would say bull SSShhh.... some computer hardware testing is so complex some times that any little change can can cause a variation of results. I strongly doubt that the exact same rig was used to test anything in different websites. So the results are strongly tied to the testing equipment. I'm sure you're smart enough to understand that concept. Anyway, if you comment again, you won the argument because I simply don't have the time to catch up to your 13950 comments. See ya around buddy.