PSU tier list 2.0

Page 134 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back then, if it wasn't Delta, Seasonic or PCP&P, it was junk. But back then, in the days of DOS, even upto 6.22, games were pretty much regulated to the simple stuff, not much better than Battleship run off basic, or D&D style games on a 16Mb 3dFx Voodoo. Most pc's still ran AT or even BT, so the psu was regulated to the backside of the bus at best. The cpu was the major power draw along with the cd/hdd/floppy on the 3.3v and 5v rails. At that time, the technology just simply didn't exist for worries about minimum requirements, and it's only with more recent advances that you get the variety of gpus with their variety of power needs.

So it's really almost impossible to guage differences between 80's pc's and now. Be like asking the differences between cornering and handling of a horse and buggy vrs a Corvette.
 

You know how the rail distribution is on the Super Flower we're talking about? I don't and that's why i don't like it.I get the feeling it's picked just because it is Super Flower.

Is the same with the XFX XT that's talked about here,lower grade caps from what i read and people trying to talk it right because XFX,but if Corsair uses those caps are they rubbish.






If Corsair would you not ask that question,you would just dismiss it as a bad psu.

 
I haven't really decided either way on the XT's, I'm waiting on a solid review. It's known that the caps are lower quality, just like everything else Tier 3 and below, but that's not what is interesting about it. What was interesting in the one review I've found is that it was stated that it had all the protection features and that they worked. If someone is bound and determined to use a cheaper PSU, it would be nice if it didn't take out the rest of the system when it failed.
 



If I had 70 grand laying around in a change jar I'd be on my yacht sipping a drink with an umbrella in it instead of posting this. :lol:
 

I meant that a PSU with a 3 year warranty might pass the test, but the same PSU would fail the test if it had a five-year warranty, simply because the warranty was longer so it had to last longer.

I don't think you'll find a single PSU (except maybe server, but even then depends on trip points) capable of doing that kind of overload 24/7/365 at max temp for ten+ years.

Testing trip points (and that they're actually present) is definitely something that should happen IMHO.
 


Corsair has had a worse track record than XFX, that's why. And what Superflower unit are you talking about here? I don't see any mention of one, unless you're referring to a unit that uses Superflower as OEM... or a Superflower sold unit? I'm not sure.

I was asking a more intelligent question with the heatsinks. And I will admit that I do not like Corsair. I'm sick of 2 out of 3 PSUs on pcpartpicker being Corsair. I can't stand the company. But I don't have a bias against their products because of that. you may think I do, but I don't. I just see them for what they are.
 

Since the VS and CX yes,well within the gaming pc's we are asked about (don't know how many that are sold that do just fine) ,but the more expensive units are still good and they seem to try to do better.Hope the new CX will be anyway and will be a nice choice for a budget game pc.




This is what it's about,




@CTurbo,
I have no problem with miltiple rails,but for such a 450watt psu would imo two be more than enough.
 
I have actually never had a Delta failure in all my years dealing with computers and that includes all of the oem units I've come across. That is why I am so confident in them.

I know that EVERY manufacture has failures. I'm not saying that every Delta psu is perfect and will last forever. I'm just saying they have a an excellent track record for longevity.
 
Speaking of Earthwatts, has anyone checked out the Sparkle 500 platinum by FSP? As far as I can tell, it's based on the Aurum 92+ platform like the Platinum Antec Earthwatts, and is currently hovering at $50. Looks pretty much the same as far as I can see through the venting on the Sparkle unit.
 


New unit, not looking particularly promising. I would stick with the GB based units in that price range for now.
Antec Neo Eco 400/620 (C)
Antec High Current Gamer (M) 400-620
XFX Core 450-550
XFX TS 550 Bronze
Seasonic S12II Bronze
Seasonic M12II Bronze 520-620
 


Someone did a breakdown of the 400W version which has capacitors that aren't good. However, the 600W version is unknown, and surprisingly has a 5 year warranty. I cannot wait until reviewers get their hands on these. You can never judge one power supply based on another, they are all their own unique units, so for all we know the 600W version could prove to be something very competitive, and the 500W.
 
It looks like the 600W version also uses the CS capacitors, as seen in this image:

xIIbuTb.png


It's either that or Teapo in this pic, but I think it's the CS.
 
Depends on whoand where not what. There are plenty of caps in a psu that see so little actual load that it wouldn't make a difference. Cheapo caps on the primary or secondaries are a different story altogether. They see huge amounts of load, but the caps used in signal filters or fan controls see next to nothing. So does a CapXon cap or Teapo or CS in those areas that are well over specs make a difference? Some say yes, some say no. Some ppl insist on all Japanese 105° solid caps, some don't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS