[citation][nom]n2cheval[/nom]Not to be a troll, but this argument and the above reasoning of "so windows might be able to use my extra RAM" is the same as IP4 or IP6. "We're running out of IP addresses! All gone by 1998, umm 2001..2002..5..9..12?" Just as the reasoning of "so I can use my 12GB of RAM" is nuts. There are very few applications that use 3G (VMs, very large databases, poorly designed games, etc) Just ask Microsoft itself about making Visual Studio 64bit.http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archiv [...] rsion.aspxSorry, not happening there.We should all be running Win7-64 for the little reasons that the above posters might not be aware of, namely driver signing (more code verification = less bugs), memory address mapping (ever loaded a 32bit object into a 64 bit program?), video memory address mapping, (big one) lots of applications will only come out in 64bit, get rid of the 32bit emulators (might as well just drive around with your hand brake on), more but you get the point though finally as above, to get the Visual Studio team get on with the 64bit party.[/citation]
hmma thats very funny, true but funny... especially when i run no direct 64 bit software, but i do run enough programs at once to occupy 6 of my 8 gbs of ram....