I have not posted here before, but am on another message board and was following the stress test. I came here hoping they would put up some official information, but I was wrong. To clearify things the second board was ASUS P5ND2-SLI Deluxe. It is an NF4 board also. The third board is ASUS P5LD2 Deluxe. It is an i945 chipset board. It is not a true SLI board. They are running with only one card and it looks like they might have swapped the PS as the end of the ATX cable has a black foam wrap and a zip tie. They have also pulled the graphics card and memory, but it looks to be the same type.
I stopped counting the reboots and any IT guy would have pulled the system a long time ago. I think they have been talking to engineers from ASUS, PC Power and Cooling, GigaByte, nVidia, and Intel all morning trying to get this system up. The thing is a mess. I think they are trying to narrow it down to the CPU before Intel will send another sample. Things do not look good.
The other thing I noted was the power... the power meter shows ~360w... that is at the plug with the AMD system running. With both systems going the total is 820w. That puts the P-EE system at ~460w. That is 120w more. Now the PS is supposed to be an ATX 2.0 so it is at least 70% efficient. That puts the AMD system at ~250w and the P-EE at ~320w. The only differance between them is the memory, motherboard, and CPU and seeing as they both use NF4 chipsets and DDR2 is supposed to draw less power, that puts the power draw of the P-EE EXTREMELY high. Assuming the X2 draws about 80w, that P4 is potentially drawing ~150w or more. Now either AMD's is drawing much less than what it is rated for or Intel's is drawing MUCH more (or a little of both).
Now for the DivX part of things. I do not really mind DivX, but he likes use XMPEG which is VERY buggy and does favour the P-4. Not too many people use it. Likely it is set at minimum priority and sits idle most of the time. The P-EE has 4 logical cores which can handle loadbalancing the 4 applications better. Litterally the test was stacked in Intel's favour right from the start. This is NOT a "real world" situation by a long shot. Now playing FarCry while running DVD Shink would be something I would do if my Athlon64 3500+ could handle it. Maybe he should have picked a game and one compression program that was multi-threaded to lead all the logical cores down. That would have been a much more accurate and realistic test.
Hopefully THG gives an official update. Last time they updated every day what was going on. The system has basically died completely and they have not said a thing.