Tom's Hardware Passmark-CPU Benchmark Thread

[The Paladin]

I do overclock it, 4790k @ 4.7 when I get to 4.9 its gets all sorts of squirrely and HOT, just think I never won the lottery

 

[EquineHero]

This is my E5800 or my cpu from my first rig.
(the actual voltage set in bios was 1.525V)
Some might call me crazy but i run it on stock cooler hahahaha.

See where the voltage curve flattens? You can still move those up with the rest of the curve.

Set your fans to 100%, I got my 1050Ti to 2.15GHz before, and that one was the SSC without 6-pin.

If that doesn't work, do the shunt mod. Just google it. Still a good score though.

not overclocked yet......

I7 7700k

I need single threaded in that image please.

@EquineHero:

Could i make your life a little harder and ask if you could put @ what speed the CPUs were running at on the chart? Its a little confusing seeing multiple cpus with different scores. I did as much leg work as i could for you 😀

Also got in my new 8700K build last night, did a quick run at stock and was about 1000points behind Biglizard

Yeah, done. Just gotta update the main table.

yeah, yeah. I saw that 4790K score, but he's on Z97 and I on Z87 there are more difficulties running it stable at 4.8-5.0Ghz.
but I wonder why my Q9400 is showing so much slower than the Q6600 though..

His Q6600 is OC'd.


Robert, that C2D at 4.5GHz, are you insane? Get some liquid and put it at 5GHz. That single threaded score is impressive too.

 

[faalin]

Hopefully i have time this weekend i can really mess around with the new rig. Just did a down and dirty overclock with a 51x100 OC and left the voltage on auto. Top core peaked at 83*c with 1.36v so im hoping with fine tuning i should be able to drop the voltage a little, might delid it as well but not sure yet. My GTX 980SC is really holding everything back, some sites show up to 20% bottleneck on the 8700k plus im running 2 4K monitors which i know the 980 cant push so going for stupid high OC's on the cpu isnt helping anything.

Random question: with the MB i can do a performance setting, it set my 3200Mhz ram to 2166Mhz and cpu to 48x105. what does the 105 blck do to my system? Havent OC'd with blck since the gen 1's, i did notice that @ 48 it only runs my voltage at 1.2 and as soon as i bump to a 49 it goes to 1.36v on auto.

 

[RememberThe5th]

This is my E5800 or my cpu from my first rig.
(the actual voltage set in bios was 1.525V)
Some might call me crazy but i run it on stock cooler hahahaha.

See where the voltage curve flattens? You can still move those up with the rest of the curve.

Set your fans to 100%, I got my 1050Ti to 2.15GHz before, and that one was the SSC without 6-pin.

If that doesn't work, do the shunt mod. Just google it. Still a good score though.

not overclocked yet......

I7 7700k

I need single threaded in that image please.

@EquineHero:

Could i make your life a little harder and ask if you could put @ what speed the CPUs were running at on the chart? Its a little confusing seeing multiple cpus with different scores. I did as much leg work as i could for you 😀

Also got in my new 8700K build last night, did a quick run at stock and was about 1000points behind Biglizard

Yeah, done. Just gotta update the main table.

yeah, yeah. I saw that 4790K score, but he's on Z97 and I on Z87 there are more difficulties running it stable at 4.8-5.0Ghz.
but I wonder why my Q9400 is showing so much slower than the Q6600 though..

His Q6600 is OC'd.


Robert, that C2D at 4.5GHz, are you insane? Get some liquid and put it at 5GHz. That single threaded score is impressive too.

Thats not Core 2 Duo, its Pentium E5800 the last CPU for 775 socket, and the temps are well under 70*C(because the temperature outside is 10-15*C and i just open window) on 1.525V (1.487V actual) still need to get new motherboard and new ram for insane overclock. I've managed once 4.7-8GHz but more than that nope.

 

[faalin]

@Robert

LOL i did that with my first I7 i had, was a 950 under full water cooling. Opened a window and shoved the side panel right into it, think it was somewhere around 10*f outside at the time. CPU was running at 15*c @ 4.9Ghz and both GPUs were at 9*c

Side box had dual danger den black ice extreme 480 radiators sandwiched between Scythe DFS123812-3000 "ULTRA KAZE" 3000rpm 133CFM fans. Had some fun with that computer, that board is now running my 980x at work.

 

[RememberThe5th]

@Robert

LOL i did that with my first I7 i had, was a 950 under full water cooling. Opened a window and shoved the side panel right into it, think it was somewhere around 10*f outside at the time. CPU was running at 15*c @ 4.9Ghz and both GPUs were at 9*c

Side box had dual danger den black ice extreme 480 radiators sandwiched between Scythe DFS123812-3000 "ULTRA KAZE" 3000rpm 133CFM fans. Had some fun with that computer, that board is now running my 980x at work.

hahhahahahahaa damb, that fan setup, well if got this summer custom watercooling with i5 or i7 4th gen ill overclock hell out of it and i need bigger case because my 1050ti barley fit in it.

Paladin or Equine Hero change that C2D to Pentium.

My test rig looks like cheap garbage (paid 70$ total LOL).

Spoiler

That weird fan is actually fixed R7 250 (somewhat fixed,modded bios 1.25V 1250MHz core and 1100MHz memory) as i don't have time neither i don't wanna mess up it more.
It serves as Lakka console emulator (ps2,ps1, nes,snes,genesis emulators).

 

[The Paladin]

wait what ? My CPU is a Core 2 Quad Q9400, why would I mark it as a Pentium? *confused*

 

[RememberThe5th]

wait what ? My CPU is a Core 2 Quad Q9400, why would I mark it as a Pentium? *confused*

No mine Pentium E5800 is marked wrongly as core 2 duo... its Pentium.
https://ark.intel.com/products/42802/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5800-2M-Cache-3_20-GHz-800-MHz-FSB

 

[faalin]

Yeah been through a few water builds.

i7 950 with dual 480's ran on 3 loops. CPU, GPUs, MB ran 21 ultra kaze fans and sounded like a jet.
https://i.imgur.com/UPCQH5w.jpg

Same motherboard running a i7 980x and 4 670 superclock+, sold off the 670's swapped over to air and 2 780's now
https://i.imgur.com/Hx8675p.jpg

I7 2600k dual 580's, ran dual 360mm radiators in the bottom fan-rad-fan-fan-rad-fan sandwich stack and another 480 on top
https://i.imgur.com/268NZex.jpg

I5 2500k and GTX 670
https://i.imgur.com/v6qJ78U.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/9fdtR1j.jpg

I7 2600k with dual 560 ti
https://i.imgur.com/F0Bqkhs.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/7ewmHd9.jpg

Now i just stick to air cooling 🙁 dont have time to mess with water loops and finding every ounce of OC in a cpu and gpu anymore.

 

[The Paladin]

so I played with it today... and I7-4790K @ x50 Multiplier is very unstable, and x49 @ 1.350 temps get into mid 95's during test making very nervous. (score 12981) but best score I got is using; (I run 4 runs to make sure its even)
x48 @ 1.355v = 13087., I am going to surmise it is because I am running a Z87 gryphon and not a z97 board.

 

[EquineHero]

so I played with it today... and I7-4790K @ x50 Multiplier is very unstable, and x49 @ 1.350 temps get into mid 95's during test making very nervous. (score 12981) but best score I got is using; (I run 4 runs to make sure its even)
x48 @ 1.355v = 13087., I am going to surmise it is because I am running a Z87 gryphon and not a z97 board.

Don't sweat it, just de-lid.

I can't bench 5Ghz properly, the Compression test crashes and the Physics test freezes my PC.

At 4.9 I don't have crazy temps at 1.35 to 1.4, most mine gets is 80C when I have FRAPS recording and the machine freezes sometimes at 4.9.

4.8 is the highest and most stable I could get. 4.9 is good for average use but I can't render video or play CPU intensive games.

Strange that my 4.8GHz score does better than my 4.9Ghz recently did.

Table will be updated shortly. I feel like I should get some sort of badge for this.

 

[ccfonzie]

My updated Score running i7 7700k @5.0ghz this am.....Did a proper posting of the CPU score,my 1st one was Passmark total score (sorry EquineHero) not showing single thread. Squeezed an extra 900 points up.

 

[oriol.delavega]

Ryzen 7 1800X @ 3.9 GHz

 

[EquineHero]

My updated Score running i7 7700k @5.0ghz this am.....Did a proper posting of the CPU score,my 1st one was Passmark total score (sorry EquineHero) not showing single thread. Squeezed an extra 900 points up.

That score worries me. Should be a lot higher for 5GHz, more like 14K

Ryzen 7 1800X @ 3.9 GHz
Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200 CL16 4x8 GB @ 3066 MHz

Ya, I don't care what RAM you have or how much, or how fast it is. Only care about CPU and CPU speed. I don't need that extra info nor do I care about it.

This also isn't the place to show off, all I'm doing is putting a table together so I have a collective place where people can gauge performance to make smarter buying decisions.

Example. Most you need for any modern games at 1080p Ultra is a Passmark score of 6000 or a single threaded over 1000.

You wanna show off? Post in the Superposition thread, we have some pro overclockers, including me, over there.

Table will be updated shortly.

 

[oriol.delavega]

Ya, I don't care what RAM you have or how much, or how fast it is. Only care about CPU and CPU speed. I don't need that extra info nor do I care about it.

This also isn't the place to show off, all I'm doing is putting a table together so I have a collective place where people can gauge performance to make smarter buying decisions.

Example. Most you need for any modern games at 1080p Ultra is a Passmark score of 6000 or a single threaded over 1000.

You wanna show off? Post in the Superposition thread, we have some pro overclockers, including me, over there.

Table will be updated shortly.

I do not care about showing off. RAM speed plays a part in Ryzen CPU performance, so I though it might be useful for other people reading the thread. Anyway, I updated the post and deleted this info. Sorry but I won't post another screenshot so, if you want, I will delete it.

I apologize. Best regards.

 

[ccfonzie]

That score worries me. Should be a lot higher for 5GHz, more like 14K

No not at all... I didn't disable Windows Defender and some background programs were running. I know I can get it higher. I'm not that far off. I just did a quick overclock/reboot and quick run of the cpu score (about 900 points more from 4.5). I'll do another complete bench. This system was just built 5 days ago.

 

[EquineHero]

I do not care about showing off. RAM speed plays a part in Ryzen CPU performance, so I though it might be useful for other people reading the thread. Anyway, I updated the post and deleted this info. Sorry but I won't post another screenshot so, if you want, I will delete it.

I apologize. Best regards.

Just keep irrelavant information to a minimum. Casual conversation about the topic is fine but the Superposition thread is 5 pages long because we had a discussion about my QC-failed Corsair power supply.

No not at all... I didn't disable Windows Defender and some background programs were running. I know I can get it higher. I'm not that far off. I just did a quick overclock/reboot and quick run of the cpu score (about 900 points more from 4.5). I'll do another complete bench. This system was just built 5 days ago.

Windows 10 loves to run background processes with high CPU. I have a program called Prio which lets me set CPU priority, CPU I/O priority, core affinity, and saves the core affinity after a process is terminated.

I've also disabled Windows Defender, it doesn't do anything a good, large hosts file can't do.

 

[EquineHero]

I AM AN OVERCLOCKING GOD

4.2GHz score pending

 

[EquineHero]

I CAN UNMAKE THE UNIVERSE WITH MY OVERCLOCKING ABILITY

Got a locked-multipler 2.66GHz CPU to 4.2GHz, onward to 5GHz?

 

[EquineHero]

--snip--

See if you can get that i7 870 to over 4GHz. I got my X3450 (basically an i5 750 with ECC support) to 4.2GHz and it kicks the crap out of your i7 score.

 

[RememberThe5th]

Well if you have the opportunity to take it to 5GHz with good cooling i would try it, i pushed my E5800 1.57V (1.55V actual) but didn't take any higher OC.

 

[EquineHero]

Well if you have the opportunity to take it to 5GHz with good cooling i would try it, i pushed my E5800 1.57V (1.55V actual) but didn't take any higher OC.

That's a dual core at 65W, this is a quad core at 95W, gets mad hot during the Cinebench runs. I've only got one spare 120mm AiO at the moment, so I'm afraid 4.2Ghz is the best I can do right now, at least until I get my Intel DH55 desktop board.

 

[RememberThe5th]

Well if you have the opportunity to take it to 5GHz with good cooling i would try it, i pushed my E5800 1.57V (1.55V actual) but didn't take any higher OC.

That's a dual core at 65W, this is a quad core at 95W, gets mad hot during the Cinebench runs. I've only got one spare 120mm AiO at the moment, so I'm afraid 4.2Ghz is the best I can do right now, at least until I get my Intel DH55 desktop board.

If its cold outside, throw it out hahahaha, well i have quad core Q6600 i tried 1.525V and i can agree with you that temps hit 80*C+ maybe 85*C on full load for 5 min didn't wanted to risk more.

Have you tried Push&Pull full RPM?
One question, did intel only allowed overclocking on 1156 motherboard/socket (with their brand as Intel Desktop board) as i remember Intel=No overclock.

 

[EquineHero]

Well if you have the opportunity to take it to 5GHz with good cooling i would try it, i pushed my E5800 1.57V (1.55V actual) but didn't take any higher OC.

That's a dual core at 65W, this is a quad core at 95W, gets mad hot during the Cinebench runs. I've only got one spare 120mm AiO at the moment, so I'm afraid 4.2Ghz is the best I can do right now, at least until I get my Intel DH55 desktop board.

If its cold outside, throw it out hahahaha, well i have quad core Q6600 i tried 1.525V and i can agree with you that temps hit 80*C+ maybe 85*C on full load for 5 min didn't wanted to risk more.

Have you tried Push&Pull full RPM?
One question, did intel only allowed overclocking on 1156 motherboard/socket (with their brand as Intel Desktop board) as i remember Intel=No overclock.

All pre-Sandy locked chips could OC infinitely (as long as you didn't mind RAM freq increase) via the bus. First gen K/unlocked chips (i7-875K, Core 2 Extreme QXxx) allowed you to OC via the multiplier instead of the bus (aka not tying it to RAM).

With Sandy Bridge, bus overclocking was made obsolete, mainly because the bus was lined with the Sata controller, meaning running a high BCLK would risk of corrupting your data. Intel gave users 4 unlocked bins to compensate.

With Haswell, those 4 unlocked bins were removed, forcing users to get a K (unlocked) chip to overclock. I suppose a lack of competition from AMD at the time didn't really help.

With Skylake, the base/bus clock is no longer linked to the SATA interface. Meaning if you were lucky enough to have an older Skylake board, you could BCLK OC the Skylake chips.

The Intel DH55 desktop board was unique that it allowed multiplier overclocking on ANY chip. There's one on Amazon I want that's only $95, can't wait to OC my i3 540 and see how fast I can get it.

 

[RememberThe5th]

Well if you have the opportunity to take it to 5GHz with good cooling i would try it, i pushed my E5800 1.57V (1.55V actual) but didn't take any higher OC.

That's a dual core at 65W, this is a quad core at 95W, gets mad hot during the Cinebench runs. I've only got one spare 120mm AiO at the moment, so I'm afraid 4.2Ghz is the best I can do right now, at least until I get my Intel DH55 desktop board.

If its cold outside, throw it out hahahaha, well i have quad core Q6600 i tried 1.525V and i can agree with you that temps hit 80*C+ maybe 85*C on full load for 5 min didn't wanted to risk more.

Have you tried Push&Pull full RPM?
One question, did intel only allowed overclocking on 1156 motherboard/socket (with their brand as Intel Desktop board) as i remember Intel=No overclock.

All pre-Sandy locked chips could OC infinitely (as long as you didn't mind RAM freq increase) via the bus. First gen K/unlocked chips (i7-875K, Core 2 Extreme QXxx) allowed you to OC via the multiplier instead of the bus (aka not tying it to RAM).

With Sandy Bridge, bus overclocking was made obsolete, mainly because the bus was lined with the Sata controller, meaning running a high BCLK would risk of corrupting your data. Intel gave users 4 unlocked bins to compensate.

With Haswell, those 4 unlocked bins were removed, forcing users to get a K (unlocked) chip to overclock. I suppose a lack of competition from AMD at the time didn't really help.

With Skylake, the base/bus clock is no longer linked to the SATA interface. Meaning if you were lucky enough to have an older Skylake board, you could BCLK OC the Skylake chips.

The Intel DH55 desktop board was unique that it allowed multiplier overclocking on ANY chip. There's one on Amazon I want that's only $95, can't wait to OC my i3 540 and see how fast I can get it.

"When intel Dooms himself with its own product" I didn't know that 1156 had K chips 😵, well i saw them in app of my smartphone but never tought of this...

Thanks for information