I think Intel have a hand above AMD when it comes to the value processor market because of this:
Ok, so one of my clients has got an old generic PIII motherboard (w/ PIII 700meg) their father-in-law picked up on the cheap on his way through Asia. It doesn't have any sort of brandname that I've even heard of before.. Anyhow, it is outdated, needs replacing. Heck, I can't even seem to be able get it to initialize read from CD-ROM at startup, the BIOS is so freaking shoddy. So I was going to replace it with a Sempron budget chip from AMD, to keep the cost down, to make it a little more "future-proof" than it is at the moment. as they have no requirement for performance and just want to get it onto XP - you know the whole story.
But of course, you can't because AMD doesn't do any budget Sempron chips on the 939 pin variety!!! and you have to either spend NZD$250 straight up on the lowest end Athlon 64, or buy an Intel!!
So why doesn't AMD make value chips available for their only still living platform??[/i]
Ok, so one of my clients has got an old generic PIII motherboard (w/ PIII 700meg) their father-in-law picked up on the cheap on his way through Asia. It doesn't have any sort of brandname that I've even heard of before.. Anyhow, it is outdated, needs replacing. Heck, I can't even seem to be able get it to initialize read from CD-ROM at startup, the BIOS is so freaking shoddy. So I was going to replace it with a Sempron budget chip from AMD, to keep the cost down, to make it a little more "future-proof" than it is at the moment. as they have no requirement for performance and just want to get it onto XP - you know the whole story.
But of course, you can't because AMD doesn't do any budget Sempron chips on the 939 pin variety!!! and you have to either spend NZD$250 straight up on the lowest end Athlon 64, or buy an Intel!!
So why doesn't AMD make value chips available for their only still living platform??[/i]