I get sick of all these stupid named versions, why can't all the companies just add a number for the next version. The whole 7 thing is stupid. I don't fall for this marketing stuff. If someone was looking back in 100 years I think the 95, 98, ME, XP, VISTA, 7, .next will confuse them in terms of what came after what.
Use something similar to ext4 (minimal fragmentation).
Have a modular, lightweight OS thats easily customizable and can be hot fixed on the fly without restarting (Like Linux).
Get rid of the BSD and have a self solving system to revert from the problem once its detected and then leave an alert stating what the impending error was.
I understand why that post was deleted. By the sounds of it Win8 is going to be "amazing".
With it only being a year's wait and MS' stupid update pricing it will certainly make some people wonder if they shouldn't wait up till July next year and directly move to Win8 instead of Win7.
[citation][nom]shuffman37[/nom]Use something similar to ext4 (minimal fragmentation).Have a modular, lightweight OS thats easily customizable and can be hot fixed on the fly without restarting (Like Linux).Get rid of the BSD and have a self solving system to revert from the problem once its detected and then leave an alert stating what the impending error was. Enjoy =)[/citation]
Excellent point, lets get microsoft to just rebrand and modify ubuntu then the name can be Windows ubuntu edition.
Too bad that'll never happen 🙁
On second thought they'd need to finish Wine too else "slight" compatibility errors would happen