LOL, I guess so. Guess he popped his noggin up one too many times, like some sort of gopher. But what I said was true - if you discount taking potshots at people as a rather useless activity, then he brings little if anything to the discussion table.
To jenny: While I recommend the best buy (AMD or Intel) for anyone who asks their opinion, I am currently a biased AMD user and have only bought AMD products for myself in the past 5 years. Stop alienating me.
You don't get jenny - she's not here to make friends & influence people - she has some sort of religious compulsion to bash Intel, not necessarily promote AMD. She has said as much in other threads. If some other CPU manufacturer (Via, I suppose
😛) made a better hammer, she'd be swinging that one. At any rate, she has little or no regard for the facts or fellow posters.
Good thing my Intel emo chip is defective, or else I'd have to take offense at her posts
😛.
To everyone else: Let's all just agree that the X6 will succeed if it performs at least as well as expected and has a competitively low price. There are plenty of people out there with existing AM2+/AM3 platforms that would welcome a boost in CPU power; and, there are plenty of people that haven't yet upgraded to Intel's Core i5/i7 and will have an option from AMD that competes aggressively with Intel on the price/performance front (maybe even efficiency or even efficiency/dollar). If Thuban doesn't do any of these things, God (or nature or advantageous statistical fluctuation or... jenny) help AMD.
What this thread is about, is to counteract
THIS one. Nobody says Thuban is going to suck (at least not in this thread that I have noticed). But unless the NDA gets lifted and the real benchies show something unexpected, it also doesn't look like "The world's fastest desktop CPU" either
😛.