riser
Illustrious
Beachnative :
riser :
You're concerned about truths. Truths are not facts. Our legal system is based on facts, not truths. Truths are different from all aspects, facts are not. Therefore, our legal system works based on facts, not someone else's truth. For you to believe otherwise is naive. It is also naive of you to think the one's personal truth will win over the facts.
The legal system is supposed to be based on fact but more likely the side that wins is who presents the best view of their position.
Remember OJ? Now tell me who is naive?
lol, really? Bring up OJ because you have no clue what you're talking about. OJ's case was lost by the prosecution being incompetent and under high pressure. The entire case was a joke because too many inconsistencies were in everyone's storyline, which means acquittal. For Zimmerman, the facts keep backing up his statements. Fact is, he called to report the person. Twice. That alone should be enough to remove the murder charge because there was no intent to commit murder. The manslaugther charge could possibly stick but based on those pesky facts, witnesses, police reports, and phone recording, he'll end up walking free. Even the local police force recognizes this and they are preparing for riots.
Writing is on the wall unless the prosecution can find some golden bullet to bring him down... which they won't. This whole thing has been a witch hunt based on people like you who believe personal truths are better evidence than facts in the court of law.
You are naive when it comes to the legal system.