The ugly truth about Windows 10

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pr0tEN

Reputable
Apr 11, 2015
98
0
4,660
Unstable
Windows 10 is poorly programmed,a mix of source codes from Windows 8 and Windows 7 + a few changes and that's Windows 10,I have tested a lot of Operating systems,From Windows 95 to the latest version of 10,complex software that i used in Windows 7 didn't work at all with Windows 10,
I have experiecnced a lot of weird bugs and problems,from start menu crashes,Windows Store crashes,and installed software that suddenly do not run.
Complex simulations and emulations won't even start.
It also effects games,and the most embarssing thing is the a game from Microsoft themselves crashes because of Windows 10...
and it's Quantum Break:
https://www.vg247.com/2016/04/29/quantum-break-pc-update/
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/quantum-break-pc-crash-fix-requires-microsoft-to-u/1100-6439332/
http://community.remedygames.com/forum/games/quantum-break/windows-10-help-issues/262397-display-driver-crash
http://betanews.com/2015/09/15/windows-10-is-shaping-up-to-be-the-most-unstable-release-since-millennium-edition-me/


Windows 10 doesn't care about me
from forcing me to have useless software,to send my data to the microsoft servers for the use of ads,
That data worth money and microsoft just take it from you,with the opearting system you have paid for.
I used Windows 10 Enterprise 64bit which is not targeted from the avearge user,
It has the most features,even more than the pro version and still has the useless software and one drive that in normal ways you can't delete it.
and the updates just do whatever they want...


Conclusion
Windows 10 the most unstable OS i have ever seen,even Windows Vista's code was much better.
I spent more time on fixing problems than using the OS.
After removing all the junk and spying with DWS(http://dws.wzor.net/) The system used less than 1GB of ram on idle,no internet usage with DWS on idle,no stupid pop ups.
even after DWS and disabling manually windows update,I had a problem with the UI...
There are 2 things drom everything- 2 control panels (Settings and Control Panel),2 Music players (Groove music player and Windows media Player)...
Why not having one control panel for everything?,Why all of this mess and confusion?
Why forcing users to use "One drive" and other useless things the uses the system's resources?
I use Windows 7 on all my computers and dual boot with Windows 10 on my main computer for DX12 games only...
I bought almost evey Windows version since Windows 95,
I own: 95,98,XP Proffesional,Vista Home Premium,7 Ultimate,I tested Windows 10 Enterprise in the lab of my work place.
Windows 7 was very stable even from it's early versions,I decided to use the RC version in my main computer until the RT version is released.
 
Solution


If you had even bother to look, you would find that the halved ram is a common issue with an easy fix.
It happens on windows 7 as well.
 


you expected a new operating system to work on of all things an old gateway laptop? smh

 


I'm just saying, if I could be confident that when I update my software it would fix OS compatibility issues, security vulnerabilities and bugs, but leave the UI and existing features alone, virtually every piece of software I own would be completely up to date right now. Most of them are anyway, but a few break things so often and so badly that I finally gave up and disabled their updaters. That isn't usually Windows' fault, but it does contribute to the problem.
 


Things change. In software, with few exceptions, for the better. UI/UX can't be left alone forever. They evolve aswell. The simple fact that you do not update your software.. i'm gonna stop here. Do you also disable Windows update?
 
So far, my own personal experience, as well as my in-laws' experiences, with Windows 10 has been fairly smooth sailing. The devices involved:
-- 3 Windows 10 tablets used by my nephews & brother-in-law: no problems whatsoever;
-- brother-in-law's desktop (custom-built PC with FX-8350): no problems with the upgrade
-- my desktop (custom-built PC with FX-8320): no problems with the upgrade
-- my laptop (HP ProBook 4530s): the only problem it had was with a couple of the pre-installed HP programs, which caused a minor hiccup or 2 in the upgrade process. However, since I wasn't using the programs anyway, once I uninstalled them & completed the upgrade I've had zero problems.
-- my mother-in-law's laptop (HP, think it's a DV6 but not 100% sure): my nephew had zero problems getting the upgrade to run, & aside from the usual pitfalls of having to show my mother-in-law how to use the laptop -- which only happens a) when she switches to a new OS (i.e. when she had to learn Windows 7 for the laptop after having been used to Windows XP) or b) when she has to change from using "Program X" to "Program Y", & in both cases is because she's nowhere near as familiar with computers as I am (or my wife, my sisters-in-law, my brothers-in-law, my nephews, etc.) -- there have been zero issues with the laptop & Windows 10.

As the saying goes, YMMV, but usually WYSIWYG. There's a plethora of vendors out there that provide the hardware that goes into Windows-based machines, & their track records for adhering to the standards set by Microsoft for compatibility purposes range from stellar to bottom of the barrel. Expecting Microsoft to have a 100% perfect launch on an OS when they don't control the hardware is laughable -- even Apple can't do it when they control both the hardware & OS in their own ecosystem (or they'd never have to issue OS patches to fix defects & bugs, only "new feature" updates).
 


Sometimes people have computer issues. This happens on every OS ever released. A handful of negative anecdotes in no way indicates that there's something fundamentally wrong with Windows 10.
 


I did multiple for work. So far they all work great.

I did my HTPC which has been flawless and my wifes system, again flawless.

Only system I did not do an upgrade on was my desktop which I did a clean install as I bought a copy of Pro retail for it since I upgrade often. It has been prefect actually.

The problem is that people who have issues often also have their system in a mess and do not maintain the OS software and driver wise.
 


Three programs out of 104 installed, according to Secunia PSI. I do check from time to time to see if a new version/extension/etc. has fixed something mission-critical that got axed, and if it has, then I do update. I've had that happen with Firefox several times now.

No, Windows Update is not disabled. It's set to inform me when updates are available, and I review them each month, look up what they actually do since Microsoft so helpfully decided not to provide that information anymore, and install mainly the security updates. These days most other things get hidden (I don't have Silverlight installed at all, or anything to do with GWX.)
 
Well, interesting topic...and of course, differing opinions. I'll add my two cents. I have been running 10 (developers) as a clean install on a Toshiba laptop (i3, a few years old). No real issues, but don't notice it being any zippier than running 7 (as some state seeing).

For the rest that I see (& must fix)-- these are the upgrades. I have more problems than not. Things are broken from the start (start button, task bar, apps, wifi, sound, video...), programs removed and not compatible, or "roll-backs" are also corrupt (Win 10 rollback breaks Windows update). I'm basing this on roughly 10 units, per month. Probably the biggest issue, however, is how MS is attempting to "foist" 10 onto people without them wanting the thing. I have so many people saying they're quite happy with their 7/8/8.1, but that they are constantly hounded by the "get 10" pop-up...until eventually it simply says, "installing in"...with a countdown! Not cool.

I realize MS wants to only have to support one OS & doesn't want 7 to become another XP, but the pop-up & forced (recommended update) install of 10 is ridiculous & extremely heavy-handed, imho.
 
I have not had an operating system that has not had a problem, most of them minor, cured either by a new release, myself or internet friends. The latest release crashed the system twice and I had to roll back to the previous version. Operating systems are by their very nature complex and one should not judge to harshly minor teething problems. This does not mean that we should let Microsoft get away with obvious stupidities like doubling the amount of mouse clicks to do the same job as you did in previous versions. The lock screen at the beginning annoys me. Why do you have to click on the screen to bring up the login boxes? You have to login so why not just bring up the login box immediately.

Windows 10 might have gone the same way as Vista because of poor implementation except that it is offered as a free upgrade. I am waiting for the other penny to drop when we find out what the annual subscription will be to keep it.
 


http://windows.wonderhowto.com/how-to/disable-lock-screen-windows-10-0162965/ 😉
 
For me, there was a single but crucial reason why I had to go back to Win7. My WiFi adapter (Airlive WL-1600USB) doesn't work under Win10. I've somehow managed to install the drivers under compatibility mode but even after several restarts, Win10 simply wouldn't recognize them. Ethernet cable is not an option, unfortunately.
 


i'd much rather get a new adapter(one with n support, maybe?) or, better yet, some powerline adapters if cable is out of the question than do that 😉
 
[video="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GP5_NQ_LEs"][/video]

I have Windows 10 Home on two computers and it runs just fine. Automatic driver updates and advertising can (and should) be disabled.

Chances are Microsoft was already collecting data with Windows 7 and 8.1. Again, if you don't like it, it can be toned down.
 


Yeah, cuz it's well beyond the call of duty to add some entries to the hosts file and/or run a couple of ready-made programs. Better wait until the first DX12 game you really want to play comes out so you can pay MS for what's beeing offered for free now.
 
If I could add some comment to this :
1. Every good IT administrator will never ever apply new OS before it was tested to last program you are running on the current OS.
2. Most administrators will wait for the first SP1 that will fix the most problems after the release.
3. There will be always some HW/SW that will have some issues or wont work on the new OS, that is why you should find workaround or address the issue to more experience ppl.
4. For me personally I install Windows 10 beta on my VM and after some test decide to wait untill MS fix most of the Win10 OS problems before even test it again on my VM. When the day comes and Windows 7 is not more support (2020 I think) and if MS is still have that many issues with Win10 I could aways install some Linux.

To use Windows for OS is your choose no one force you.
 


Windows 10 beta is a long time ago. Now it's well past what one would consider an "SP1" equivalent and quite a polished OS.
 


Right. The 'SP1' equivalent was the November release, v1511.
 


Then you should be REALLY worried about your cell phone provider.
 


Indeed! Not mention your credit card companies. They know you're getting a divorce 6 months before you and your spouse do these days :))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.