I frequently (at some point in time, montly) do measurements of most ssd I have somewhere sitting in chaos manor.
This was one in 2017:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b03/a0b034b6798ed8aaf1b2f908b38d2bff2c1c0b82" alt=""
and this in 2024
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7074a/7074a0f20371aa6a9a24822ad10097fcbba17294" alt=""
Not bad from 3911 to only 2835 in heavy use. My real question is in between those years I had way better markings with a different driver. Instead of Samsung SSD 960 it reads NVMe Samsung SSD and is useing ioStorAC. Are these numbers reliable at all?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f626/7f626b4143a5d7715c783a17c22d877431ef2f46" alt=""
This was one in 2017:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b03/a0b034b6798ed8aaf1b2f908b38d2bff2c1c0b82" alt=""
and this in 2024
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7074a/7074a0f20371aa6a9a24822ad10097fcbba17294" alt=""
Not bad from 3911 to only 2835 in heavy use. My real question is in between those years I had way better markings with a different driver. Instead of Samsung SSD 960 it reads NVMe Samsung SSD and is useing ioStorAC. Are these numbers reliable at all?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f626/7f626b4143a5d7715c783a17c22d877431ef2f46" alt=""