Action_Man
Splendid
Fair enough. Its just that you tacked your question on after you said some fanboy comment which gave it a negative connatation or at least to me it did.
no how k10 is gonna wipe intel out and what kind of a name is action man?
no how k10 is gonna wipe intel out and
and what kind of a name is action man?
AMD fanboys...ok man just please stop confusing me ok dude i hate being confused
stop being retaredededtetetdtetdtetdtetdtetedtetdtetdtetdtetetdtetdtet
nothing extra ordinary about conroe...coz conroe based on pentium m/pentium iii architecture...basically they have same IPC like athlon but the different is they have more cache than athlon x2.
athlon x2 1mb can beat p4 that have more cache becoz p4 have a stupid architecture...however conroe not using that stupid netburst ...and of course conroe win coz they using 4mb x 2 cache vs 1mb x 2 cache of athlon...
so what amd need to do...is just load more cache on athlon .... done...
AMD cant put more Cache in their processor cause they architecture would respond with performance penalties (whos got the stupid architecture now?).
More Cache and done... *roflz*
Then anyone could that Intel should put the Memory Controller inside the CPU and theyll be ahead forever (which kind of probably would be the case).
AMD cant put more Cache in their processor cause they architecture would respond with performance penalties (whos got the stupid architecture now?).
More Cache and done... *roflz*
Then anyone could that Intel should put the Memory Controller inside the CPU and theyll be ahead forever (which kind of probably would be the case).
Yes, but this is due to the fact the the AM2 memory controller used in testing was buggy.Guys i personally think that if intel compared the conroe chip with an am2 the difference would be much bigger.We all know that currently an fx60 is faster than an am2 processor.Also keep in mind that intel overclocked fx60.It seems that conroe is invincible at the moment.