Intel's Future Chips: News, Rumours & Reviews

Page 85 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.


Unless you want your video games to load faster it's not going to do much for you over an SSD hahahaha. And moving from 16x to 8X there is only a ~1% or less difference in FPS using a 1080Ti, so that wouldn't be a problem if you could use 8X to free up pci-e lanes.
 


I feel the same way about the 2500k I'm using. Until I can't play video games anymore I don't see the advantages yet. Honestly, I I would like to see what happens with 7nm Ryzen. I will probably upgrade for that! Buy a quality motherboard, and just pop in the new processors as they come out vs. buying a new motherboard every generation.
 


For games? Nothing.
 
Expected launch pricing for Coffee Lake

MT7wyvr.jpg


Note it is in CAD units. The i7-7700k did launch at $485 CAD.

Therefore we can expect Coffee Lake to have similar pricing to chips that replaces.
 


Yeah, that's the Intel we have come too know very well! $$$:pt1cable:😍 6 core no thread and the 4 core no thread we are getting a discount in terms of pricing, and I think i5 will be much more competitive then previously over priced i5 and i7 lines. But the i7 prices are garbage.
 
Tom's posting same number Juan linked just now.
Intel's Coffee Lake Listed At Canadian Retailer, With Pricing
by Paul Alcorn August 20, 2017 at 12:40 PM

"Intel's 8th-generation Coffee Lake architecture has been subject to the usual assortment of leaks that we see before a big launch. The Coffee Lake specifications leaked earlier this week, and now PC Canada, an online retailer celebrating its 21st anniversary, posted the models on back order. VideoCardz reports that the retailer lists restocking on September 16. Most importantly, the retailer also posted pricing, and that pricing indicates a similar cost (generation over generation) for standard SKUs, but a slight increase in "K" model pricing.
The following charts include a combination of a leaked table and a recent slide from a Chinese distribution event. Some of the readings on the slide are blurry, so we've italicized Coffee Lake entries that are open to interpretation. We also included the underlined specifications that we derived from leaked tables that appeared at AnandTech’s forum last month. Both sources feature identical specifications, and our sister site AnandTech has confirmed through external sources that the slide is genuine. As usual with any leak, we do have to caution that the information may not represent final, or even actual, specifications or pricing.
We already knew that Intel would bring more cores to the mainstream desktop models with the Coffee Lake processors, but pricing is the wildcard. The company risks cannibalizing its existing product stack if it places pricing on par with its own less-equipped alternatives, but raising prices would also essentially shift the goalposts for the i7, i5, and i3 lineups and encroach on other segments.
PC Canada's i7-8700K pricing lands roughly $30 over the -7700K's $350 MSRP, but PC Canada also lists the -7700K at $462 CAD, implying a smaller $20 price increase for the six-core -8700K. Surprisingly, the Coffee Lake i7-8700 shares nearly the same pricing as its four-core i7-7700 predecessor, which we constantly see on sale at various retailers.
Moving down the stack, the i5-8600K comes with a $20 price delta, while the i5-8400 again shares the same price range. It appears that Intel is merely tacking on an additional $20 premium for the unlocked "K" models."
"The i3 lineup slots in as the gamer-friendly mid-range. We see a $10 price delta between the -8350K and the -7350K, and again, almost identical pricing for the locked models.
Both tables above include Coffee Lake's projected performance increases over their Kaby Lake counterparts, and with such a large potential advance in the making, it's obvious that savvy customers will opt for Intel's newest processors over the previous-generation counterparts. The addition of more cores at similar price points is going to place plenty of pressure on AMD's Ryzen lineup, addressing AMD's core count advantage.
AMD's processors are still price-competitive, with a range that extends from $120 for the low end of the Ryzen 3 series to $250 for the Ryzen 5 1600X. AMD also has its pricier Ryzen 7 series that officially ranges from $329 to $499, though we often see them sell far below recommended pricing.
The Intel processors are all also expected to come with integrated graphics, which is already a key advantage over the Ryzen models. The addition of more host processing resources in tandem with integrated graphics would potentially allow Intel to effectively stave off the existing Ryzen models and possibly AMD's future APU contenders.
Intel has been particularly steadfast in its current pricing for mainstream models; it hasn't budged an inch in the face of the Ryzen competition, and this likely has more to do with long-term margin goals, especially in light of the company's famed ~60% margin. We have seen Intel lower pricing on its new Skylake-X models, at least relative to the Broadwell-era chips, which indicates the company is more willing to be flexible as it introduces new products.
In light of the increased cadence of leaks, it appears that Intel's 8th-generation processors will come to market much earlier than many expected. If the listed pricing holds true, and it's likely given the nature of the newly-competitive processor market, it could be a sign that Intel is striving to make Coffee Lake a better value proposition for regular users and enthusiasts alike, even if the new lineup will require the step up to a new motherboard."

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-coffee-lake-retail-pricing,35266.html
 


Interesting, so...+20% clockspeed gives ~9% gains...

Hmm...so they lost IPC from Kaby Lake?
 


4.5GHz to 4.7GHz is +4% clockspeed, so the IPC goes above Kaby Lake, true?
 
So how does the Xeon Phi murder plays out in the long run? Is Intel changing it's MOAR COARS strategy to something more in-line with the regular pack more stuff into the same CPU SoC route?

In a very simplistic analysis, EMIB and non-monolithic CPUs seem to be the realistic way forward to have a nice balance between costs and going wide for a single socket. KNL and that other thing they have seems to be playing to the socket crowd, so I would imagine Intel will try to converge them at some point with some fancy interconnect across dies?

Cheers!
 
Intel first 8th generation processors are just updated 7th generation chips
No Coffee Lake or Cannonlake here; these are doubled up Kaby Lake parts.
PETER BRIGHT - 8/21/2017, 3:01 AM
"The first "8th generation" Intel Core processors roll out today: a quartet of 15W U-series mobile processors. Prior generation U-series parts have had two cores, four threads; these new chips double that to four cores and eight threads. They also bump up the maximum clock speed to as much as 4.2GHz, though the base clock speed is sharply down at 1.9GHz for the top end part (compared to the 7th generation's 2.8GHz). But beyond those changes, there's little to say about the new chips, because in a lot of ways, the new chips aren't really new."
RuCa6N2.png

"Although Intel is calling these parts "8th generation," their architecture, both for their CPU and their integrated GPU, is the same as "7th generation" Kaby Lake. In fact, Intel calls the architecture of these chips "Kaby Lake refresh." Kaby Lake was itself a minor update on Skylake, adding an improved GPU (with, for example, hardware-accelerated support for 4K H.265 video) and a clock speed bump. The new chips continue to be built on Intel's "14nm+" manufacturing process, albeit a somewhat refined one."

"Earlier this year, Intel claimed that the new chips would add 30 percent performance over 7th generation parts; that number is now 40 percent. A total of 25 percent of that boost (in the SYSmark benchmark) comes from the doubled core and thread count. The remainder is split evenly between "manufacturing" improvements (which is to say, higher clock speeds) and "design" improvements."
"But what of the rest of the 8th generation? That's where Intel's story is rather messy. Desktop chips are expected in the fall. Intel wouldn't be drawn into saying anything about these, but widespread belief and expectation is that these will be six core, 12 thread parts, built on the further refined "14nm++" manufacturing process with the "Coffee Lake" core. 45W H-series mobile processors and 4.5W Y-series mobile processors will also ship."
"Intel has confirmed that at least some of these will be 10nm parts, implying that they're using the next generation Cannonlake architecture. The most likely candidates here are the smallest Y-series processors, as this would maximize yield on the new 10nm process. As such, the "8th generation" will span Kaby Lake refresh, Coffee Lake, and Cannonlake, built on 14+, 14++, and 10nm processes. It all means the "8th generation" label is not very meaningful at all."


https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/intel-first-8th-generation-processors-are-just-updated-7th-generation-chips/
 


I guess they would reduce the number of cores, increase the wide of each core in future, and increase the BW with more on package RAM for the next Phi generations. I have also had a long-time feeling that Normal Xeon and Phi Xeon lines will converge into a single product in the long-term.
 


But they will need new motherboards. Surely that is a change. *shifty eyes*
 
i7 8700k is going to be a great processor, and a huge upgrade over the i7-7800X in performance and power consumption. The only thing I don't like is the huge tax they tac on for hyperthreading! Also, with 10nm right around the corner people might want to consider that. Though the price discounts of the i3 and i5 lines should still be attractive.
 
Intel’s 6-Core 8th Generation Core i7-8700k and Core i5-8400k CPUs Get Sisoft Sandra Performance Leaked
By Usman Pirzada
4 hours ago

Core-i7-8700k-Double-Precision-Sisoft-Sandra-AsRock-Z370-Pro4.jpg

Core-i7-8700k-Aggregate-Sisoft-Sandra-AsRock-Z370-Pro4-1.jpg

Intel-Core-i5-8400-Double-Precision-Sisoft-Sandra-Benchmarks.jpg

Intel-Core-i5-8400-Aggregate-Sisoft-Sandra-Benchmark.jpg

n3IUxa5.png



There are more benchmarks if you follow the link below
http://wccftech.com/intel-core-i7-8700k-and-i5-8400k-sisoft-sandra-benchmarks/

Looking at the benchmarks we can see the i7-8700K@4.3GHz has an average power draw of 308.5W, which is over 3 times higher than it's TDP!
 


Sandra reports 253W for the 7700k

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_device.php?q=c9a598d1bfcbaec2e2a1cebcd9f990a78abd8aba8ac1e780bd90a187f5c8f9dfb68bbb9df5c8f8dea69bab8de88db080a6d5e8d0&l=en

Two more KBL cores = 50% more power consumption at the socket level, not at the platform level. Moreover, CFL uses a 14nm++ process instead the 14nm+ on KBL and would reduce power compared to a hypothetical 6C KBL.
 


Unsurprisingly, WCCFTECH is given incorrect specs. I wonder why people continue linking to those clowns... I provided correct specs for all the Coffe Lake models in this thread before. I repeat specs for the i7

5QpkNjW.jpg
 


I have to agree I'm thinking the same thing, that might be a modest figure.. With all the data centers popping up everywhere
The increased i/o an address space make very beneficial in certain workloads. Single socket epycs that can do the work of two socket xeon's, that's a big saving in required real estate an energy usage.
An market sentiment no wants another monopoly I know it's argued that it wouldn't affect decision making. But I think it will have an impact if you can get a similar product for even the very same money the best financial decision in the long term is too try to keep the much welcome competition alive an kicking. The ball is rolling again nobody wants it the way it was. This may win them some contracts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.